From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosario

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 8, 2019
169 A.D.3d 1481 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

172 KA 17–00650

02-08-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alex ROSARIO, Defendant–Appellant.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (SARA A. GOLDFARB OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (KENNETH H. TYLER, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (SARA A. GOLDFARB OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (KENNETH H. TYLER, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERIt is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree ( Penal Law § 120.10 [1 ] ) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03[3] ). We reject defendant's contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Here, because the victim identified defendant at trial and testified that he knew defendant prior to the incident, defense counsel was not ineffective in failing to call an expert witness to testify about the reliability of eyewitness identifications (see People v. Smith , 128 A.D.3d 1434, 1435, 8 N.Y.S.3d 777 [4th Dept. 2015], lv denied 26 N.Y.3d 1011, 20 N.Y.S.3d 552, 42 N.E.3d 222 [2015] ; People v. Smith , 118 A.D.3d 1492, 1493, 988 N.Y.S.2d 819 [4th Dept. 2014], lv denied 25 N.Y.3d 953, 7 N.Y.S.3d 282, 30 N.E.3d 173 [2015] ; People v. Faison , 113 A.D.3d 1135, 1136, 977 N.Y.S.2d 862 [4th Dept. 2014], lv denied 23 N.Y.3d 1036, 993 N.Y.S.2d 250, 17 N.E.3d 505 [2014] ).Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ), we further conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v. Bleakley , 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Rosario

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 8, 2019
169 A.D.3d 1481 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Rosario

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alex ROSARIO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 8, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 1481 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
92 N.Y.S.3d 826

Citing Cases

People v. Rosario

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 4th Dept: 169 AD3d 1481 (Onondaga)…