From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Romo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-00156

Submitted April 29, 2003.

May 12, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered December 20, 2000, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Susan B. Marhoffer, Mount Kisco, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Anne C. Feigus of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

On the facts presented, the imposition of consecutive terms of imprisonment was legal (see Penal Law § 70.25; People v. Gardner, 281 A.D.2d 558; People v. Roman, 215 A.D.2d 697, 698). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Romo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Romo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ROBERT ROMO, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 835