From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 17, 2016
136 A.D.3d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2013-01529.

02-17-2016

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Edwin RODRIGUEZ, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jenin Younes of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jenin Younes of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), dated February 1, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's contention that he was improperly assessed points under risk factors 9 and 10 based upon his prior youthful offender adjudication, in violation of CPL 720.35(2), is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see People v. Francis, ––– A.D.3d ––––, –––N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 00488, 2016 WL 313393 2d Dept.2016 ).

The defendant's contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive level three risk assessment is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Estrella, 90 A.D.3d 879, 934 N.Y.S.2d 718; People v. Bowles, 89 A.D.3d 171, 932 N.Y.S.2d 112) and, in any event, without merit (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701; People v. Wyatt, 89 A.D.3d 112, 931 N.Y.S.2d 85).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Ortiz, 114 A.D.3d 740, 980 N.Y.S.2d 269; People v. Bowles, 89 A.D.3d 171, 932 N.Y.S.2d 112).

DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 17, 2016
136 A.D.3d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:People of State of New York, respondent, v. Edwin Rodriguez, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1162
24 N.Y.S.3d 914

Citing Cases

People v. Cisneros-Esteban

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant's contention that he was…