From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 2009
68 A.D.3d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1751.

December 15, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered on or about April 7, 2009, which denied defendant's motion to be resentenced under the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act (L 2005, ch 643), unanimously affirmed.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (David Crow of counsel), and Proskauer Rose LLP, New York (Jed W. Friedman of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Olivia Sohmer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of the application. Defendant's extensive criminal record, the seriousness of the underlying crime, and defendant's illegal reentry into the United States and resumption of drug trafficking almost immediately after being released from custody on a prior class A-II felony drug conviction and deported outweighed any positive aspects of defendant's prison record and postrelease prospects ( see People v Peña, 55 AD3d 393).


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 2009
68 A.D.3d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9296
889 N.Y.S.2d 459

Citing Cases

People v. De La Cruz

It is well settled that a "defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 enjoys a…

People v. De La Cruz

We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's application. It is well…