From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peña

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 2008
55 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

October 16, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.), entered on or about June 20, 2007, which denied defendant's motion for resentencing under the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act (L 2005, ch 643), unanimously affirmed.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Catterson, McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of the application. Defendant's record of increasingly serious crimes, along with his illegal reentry into the United States and resumption of drug trafficking after being deported for such activity, outweighed evidence of his rehabilitation while incarcerated ( see People v Alcaraz, 46 AD3d 253). In denying resentencing, the court properly considered the totality of circumstances and did not rely solely on defendant's advantageous plea bargain ( see People v Jones, 50 AD3d 282).


Summaries of

People v. Peña

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 2008
55 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Peña

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID PEÑA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 16, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
866 N.Y.S.2d 37

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of…

People v. De La Cruz

It is well settled that a "defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 enjoys a…