From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's statements during summation warrant reversal is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Washington, 197 A.D.2d 720; People v. Bruen, 136 A.D.2d 648). In any event, the prosecutor's statements constituted fair response to the defendant's summation and did not unduly prejudice the defendant so as to deprive him of a fair trial (see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105; People v. Paulino, 187 A.D.2d 736; People v. Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837). Ritter, J.P., Copertino, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TODD ROBINSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

People v. Stith

The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain comments made by the prosecutor during…

People v. David

The defendant's contention that improper comments made by the prosecutor during summation constituted…