From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1993
197 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was prejudiced by the prosecutor's summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951; People v. Burrell, 178 A.D.2d 422; People v. Bryant, 163 A.D.2d 406; People v. Bruen, 136 A.D.2d 648). In any event, we find that the prosecutor's summation did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v. Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1993
197 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUCIAN WASHINGTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 781

Citing Cases

People v. Robinson

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's statements during summation warrant reversal is not…