From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Restifo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1976
53 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

June 10, 1976


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered September 16, 1975, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree. This matter has been before this court on two prior occasions. We first withheld determination of the appeal and directed a hearing to resolve the question of defendant's presence at a previous suppression hearing ( 44 A.D.2d 870) and then, when it was concluded that defendant had not been present thereat, we reversed his conviction and directed a new trial ( 47 A.D.2d 792). This appeal is from the conviction, which ensued following the second trial. As grounds for reversal, defendant contends that the fruits of the alleged larceny were illegally seized from the trunk of his car and thus were improperly admitted into evidence at his trial. In addition, he maintains that there was insufficient evidence before the jury to establish that the market value of alleged stolen goods exceeded $250, an essential element of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law, § 155.30, subd 1). We find no merit in either argument. There was no illegal search for the record conclusively demonstrates that defendant voluntarily opened the trunk of his automobile. His own testimony on direct and cross-examination admits the voluntariness of his actions in that regard. The merchandise was then in plain view and easily identifiable by the very same eyewitnesses who had previously observed defendant place the items in the trunk of his vehicle (People v Johnson, 41 A.D.2d 997; People v Swanberg, 22 A.D.2d 902, mod 16 N.Y.2d 649). As to the value of the articles, there was direct testimony concerning their retail worth and the merchandise itself was offered in evidence; all without objection (People v Irrizari, 5 N.Y.2d 142; People v De Gina, 46 A.D.2d 925; People v Carter, 27 A.D.2d 589; affd 19 N.Y.2d 967). Accordingly, the conviction should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Kane, J.P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Restifo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1976
53 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Restifo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BENJAMIN RESTIFO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

People v. Wandell

20) determined by the price at which it would "have been sold in the regular course of business at the time…