From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Randel

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2023
222 A.D.3d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

2021–09250 S.C.I. No. 99/21

12-06-2023

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Sean RANDEL, appellant.

Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Anna K. Diehn of counsel), for respondent.


Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Anna K. Diehn of counsel), for respondent.

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered December 3, 2021, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court erred in imposing both restitution and a mandatory surcharge is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Stebbins, 171 A.D.3d 1395, 1397, 98 N.Y.S.3d 670 ; People v. Francis, 82 A.D.3d 1263, 919 N.Y.S.2d 394 ; People v. Salmans, 49 A.D.3d 961, 962, 853 N.Y.S.2d 675 ; People v. Ziolkowski, 9 A.D.3d 915, 779 N.Y.S.2d 708 ). In any event, the contention is without merit (see Penal Law § 60.35[6] ; People v. Quinones, 95 N.Y.2d 349, 352, 717 N.Y.S.2d 86, 740 N.E.2d 231 ; People v. Hall, 303 A.D.2d 601, 756 N.Y.S.2d 494 ).

The defendant's contention that the matter requires remittal to the County Court, Dutchess County, for a reconstruction hearing with regard to a purported off-the-record presentence conference is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2] ) and based, in part, on matter outside the record. In any event, the defendant failed to establish his entitlement to a reconstruction hearing (see People v. Parris, 4 N.Y.3d 41, 44, 49–50, 790 N.Y.S.2d 421, 823 N.E.2d 827 ; see also Matter of Benjamin S., 55 N.Y.2d 116, 120, 447 N.Y.S.2d 905, 432 N.E.2d 777 ; People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 526, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332 ; People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 360 N.Y.S.2d 623, 318 N.E.2d 784 ).

LASALLE, P.J., CHAMBERS, CHRISTOPHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Randel

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2023
222 A.D.3d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Randel

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Sean Randel, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2023

Citations

222 A.D.3d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 6260
199 N.Y.S.3d 220