From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2003
303 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1999-01510, 2003-01851

Submitted February 5, 2003.

March 17, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), both rendered January 8, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree under Indictment No. 98-00144, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 98-00202, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ethel P. Ross, Rye, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael E. Bongiorno, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Ellen O'Hara Woods of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court acted properly in imposing both a mandatory surcharge and directing restitution. Since, at the time of the sentencing, the defendant had not yet made restitution, the County Court had the power to direct the defendant to pay both restitution and the mandatory surcharge (see Penal Law § 60.35; People v. Quinones, 95 N.Y.2d 349).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2003
303 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ERICK HALL, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 494

Citing Cases

People v. Randel

The defendant's contention that the County Court erred in imposing both restitution and a mandatory surcharge…