From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pittam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 2008
55 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2003-05795.

October 28, 2008.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 7, 2005 ( People v Pittam, 23 AD3d 412), modifying a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 18, 2003.

Indar Pittam, Stormville, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Gary Fidel and Jill A. Gross-Marks of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Florio, JJ.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

People v. Pittam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 2008
55 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Pittam

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. INDAR PITTAM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8347
865 N.Y.S.2d 566

Citing Cases

Pittam v. Ecole

On October 28, 2008, the Appellate Division denied Petitioner's application, holding that he failed to…