From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pierce

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 30, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-30-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reginald O. PIERCE, Defendant–Appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Robert L. Kemp of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Michael J. Flaherty, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Buffalo (Ashley R. Lowry of Counsel), for respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered June 19, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Robert L. Kemp of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Michael J. Flaherty, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Buffalo (Ashley R. Lowry of Counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[2] ) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02[1] ). Initially, we note that, “[b]y pleading guilty, defendant forfeited review of [Supreme] Court's Molineux ruling” (People v. Brown, 305 A.D.2d 1068, 1068, 759 N.Y.S.2d 830, lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 579, 764 N.Y.S.2d 389, 796 N.E.2d 481 ). Contrary to defendant's contention, the court properly refused to suppress his statements to the police inasmuch as the record establishes that defendant spoke “freely and unguardedly” in the presence of two different police officers after voluntarily waiving his Miranda rights (People v. Cascio, 79 A.D.3d 1809, 1811, 914 N.Y.S.2d 490, lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 893, 926 N.Y.S.2d 29, 949 N.E.2d 977 ; see People v. Carbonaro, 134 A.D.3d 1543, 1547–1548, 23 N.Y.S.3d 525, lv. denied 27 N.Y.3d 994, 38 N.Y.S.3d 104, 59 N.E.3d 1216, reconsideration denied 27 N.Y.3d 1149, 39 N.Y.S.3d 384, 62 N.E.3d 124 ; People v. Collins, 43 A.D.3d 1338, 1339, 842 N.Y.S.2d 624, lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 1005, 850 N.Y.S.2d 393, 880 N.E.2d 879 ). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DeJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pierce

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 30, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reginald O. PIERCE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 30, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
38 N.Y.S.3d 460
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6337

Citing Cases

People v. Sapp

Defendant concedes that his remaining contention regarding the search of his residence is unpreserved for our…

People v. Sapp

Defendant concedes that his remaining contention regarding the search of his residence is unpreserved for our…