From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pemberton

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 6, 2012
93 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-6

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Terrie D. PEMBERTON, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), imposed March 21, 2011, which, upon his conviction of sodomy in the first degree, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on August 21, 2001.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630–632, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952; People v. Ralph, 91 A.D.3d 796, 936 N.Y.S.2d 903; People v. Algarin, 89 A.D.3d 859, 932 N.Y.S.2d 358).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., ENG, CHAMBERS, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pemberton

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 6, 2012
93 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Pemberton

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Terrie D. PEMBERTON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1689
938 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

People v. Jones

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. Since the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally…

People v. Harpe

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his…