From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harpe

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2012
100 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-7

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamale L. HARPE, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Lucas E. Wherry on the brief), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Lucas E. Wherry on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), imposed April 1, 2011, which, upon his convictions of attempted murder in the second degree, the resentence being, in effect, concurrent periods of postrelease supervision in addition to the concurrent determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed on May 2, 2003.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630–632, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952;People v. Pemberton, 93 A.D.3d 681, 938 N.Y.S.2d 922;People v. Ralph, 91 A.D.3d 796, 796–797, 936 N.Y.S.2d 903).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

ENG, P.J., SKELOS, CHAMBERS and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harpe

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2012
100 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Harpe

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamale L. HARPE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7318
952 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

People v. Tucker

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, his resentencing to a term…