From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Paulin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 2010
74 A.D.3d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Summary

In Paulin and Pratts, the Appellate Division agreed with that conclusion, and affirmed (People v Paulin, 74 AD3d 685 [1st Dept 2010]; People v Pratts, 74 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2010]).

Summary of this case from People v. Paulin

Opinion

No. 3150.

June 29, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John E. Collins, J.), entered November 12, 2009, which denied defendant's CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Maureen L. Grosdidier of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, McGuire and Román, JJ.


Defendant is not eligible to be resentenced under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act (L 2009, ch 56), in that he was released on parole from custody on his drug conviction, but reincarcerated for a parole violation ( see People v Pratts, 74 AD3d 536).


Summaries of

People v. Paulin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 2010
74 A.D.3d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

In Paulin and Pratts, the Appellate Division agreed with that conclusion, and affirmed (People v Paulin, 74 AD3d 685 [1st Dept 2010]; People v Pratts, 74 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2010]).

Summary of this case from People v. Paulin
Case details for

People v. Paulin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID LANCE PAULIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 2010

Citations

74 A.D.3d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5684
902 N.Y.S.2d 817

Citing Cases

People v. Paulin

The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, an order of the Orange County Court (Robert H. Freehill,…

People v. Velez

Similarly, the First Department concluded that the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act (L.2009, ch. 56), "was not…