From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Padron

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Dec 12, 2016
50 N.Y.S.3d 27 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

No. 570722/10.

12-12-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas PADRON, Defendant–Appellant.


Judgment of conviction (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered March 11, 2010, reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Criminal Court failed to meet its core responsibilities under People v. O'Rama, 78 N.Y.2d 270, 277 (1991), to read the substantive jury note into the record and allow defense counsel a full opportunity to suggest an appropriate response. As the People concede, this failure constituted a mode of proceedings error that is exempt from the preservation requirements and requires reversal (see People v. Kisoon, 8 NY3d 129 [2007] ; People v. Howell, 106 AD3d 835 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1042 [2013] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT

I concur


Summaries of

People v. Padron

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Dec 12, 2016
50 N.Y.S.3d 27 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

People v. Padron

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas PADRON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 12, 2016

Citations

50 N.Y.S.3d 27 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)