From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Orr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 8, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defendant correctly points out that the People have an obligation to disclose the existence of any agreement between the prosecution and a witness to induce the witness to testify (People v Novoa, 70 N.Y.2d 490; People v Cwikla, 46 N.Y.2d 434; see generally, Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83), in this case, there was no agreement in existence which might have induced the subject witness to testify against the defendant. Thus, there was no Brady violation (see, People v Miller, 174 A.D.2d 989, 990).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find that they are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Rosario, 142 A.D.2d 743), or without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Lawrence, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Orr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Orr

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DYLAN ORR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Citing Cases

People v. Snickles

While County Court considered such testimony in determining the motion to dismiss, there is no evidence of…

People v. Murray

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not…