From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 1994
210 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 5, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15). The defendant's contention that the People failed to disclose that there was a cooperation agreement between the prosecution and a witness (see, People v Orr, 190 A.D.2d 760) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Peralta, 168 A.D.2d 466; People v Prendergast, 118 A.D.2d 602; People v McKay, 162 A.D.2d 146). In any event, it is without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Lawrence, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 1994
210 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAMERON MURRAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 970