From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Neil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 17, 1995

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Wiggins, Jr., J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for review his present contention that County Court erred in not requiring the prosecution to articulate race-neutral reasons for the exercise of peremptory challenges against two prospective jurors, one black and one hispanic. Defendant cannot rely upon the objection of the attorney for the codefendant to preserve an issue for review (see, People v. Buckley, 75 N.Y.2d 843, 846; People v. Reid, 192 A.D.2d 1117, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 1078).

Defendant's contention that the court's charge on accessorial liability with respect to counts three and four was inadequate is unpreserved (see, CPL 470.05), and we decline to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [a]).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit.


Summaries of

People v. Neil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Neil

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL NEIL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 974

Citing Cases

People v. Spencer

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court erred in permitting the People to…

People v. Spencer

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court erred in permitting the People to…