From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Narcissi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2001-05963.

June 27, 2005.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated August 4, 2003 ( People v. Narcissi, 307 AD2d 1076), affirming a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed June 14, 2001.

Narval Narcissi, Stormville, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and William R. King of counsel), for respondent.

Stuart D. Rubin, Brooklyn, N.Y. former appellate counsel.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Cozier and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 US 745; People v. Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

People v. Narcissi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Narcissi

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NARVAL NARCISSI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 300

Citing Cases

Narcissi v. Mazzuca

In it, appellate counsel argued that he addressed all meritorious claims on appeal. Petitioner's motion was…