From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 1998
247 A.D.2d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 19, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J., on Wade motion; Martin Rettinger, J., at plea and sentence).


The court's summary denial of defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was proper. Defendant did not dispute the People's contention that defendant and the victim had a relationship prior to the incident so as to render a hearing unnecessary (People v. De Jesus, 244 A.D.2d 244; People v. Estrada, 241 A.D.2d 378, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 1011).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 1998
247 A.D.2d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES MURRAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 457

Citing Cases

People v. Reid

Defendant's failure to challenge the People's assertion that he and the complaining witness were known to…

People v. Reid

Defendant's failure to challenge the People's assertion that he and the complaining witness were known to…