From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Melvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 2001
279 A.D.2d 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted December 1, 2000

January 11, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered March 1, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Alan S. Zigman, Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, ACTING P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The certificate of conviction produced by the People in this case was sufficient to establish that the defendant was a second felony offender (see, CPL 60.60; People v. Parsons, 84 A.D.2d 510, affd 55 N.Y.2d 858). "Unlike the situation in People v. Van Buren ( 82 N.Y.2d 878), where the certificate of conviction produced by the People identified the previously convicted individual by nothing more than name, in this case the evidence offered by the People identified [the] defendant by name, [and by] date of birth" (People v. Richards, 266 A.D.2d 714, 715-716). Thus, the defendant was properly sentenced as a second felony offender.


Summaries of

People v. Melvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 2001
279 A.D.2d 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Melvin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ANTON MELVIN, APPELLANT. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 409

Citing Cases

People v. Switzer

In any event, even assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in admitting the fingerprint cards in evidence,…

People v. Shaw

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, as the record reveals that defense…