From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mead

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 14, 2017
500 Mich. 967 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154584 COA: 327881

04-14-2017

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Larry Gerald MEAD, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to that court for consideration of: (1) whether this Court's peremptory order in People v. LaBelle , 478 Mich. 891 (2007), is distinguishable; (2) whether the record demonstrates that the police officer reasonably believed that the driver had common authority over the backpack in order for the driver's consent to justify the search, see Illinois v. Rodriguez , 497 U.S. 177, 181, 183–189; 110 S. Ct. 2793; 111 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990) ; and (3) whether there are any other grounds upon which the search may be justified.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Mead

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 14, 2017
500 Mich. 967 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Mead

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Larry Gerald MEAD…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Apr 14, 2017

Citations

500 Mich. 967 (Mich. 2017)
500 Mich. 967

Citing Cases

People v. Mead

[] People v. Mead , 500 Mich. 967, 892 N.W.2d 379…

People v. Mead

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacated the Court of Appeals decision and remanded to that Court with…