From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McIntyre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 1980
77 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

July 10, 1980

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: The defendant had been indicted for a violation of section 263.05 Penal of the Penal Law resulting from his having taken a number of Polaroid photographs of his 12-year-old niece in various degrees of undress and in various postures. County Court dismissed the indictment, holding that the evidence before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient under the statute to establish that defendant had used his niece in a sexual performance. This was error. Performance is defined in subdivision 4 of section 263.00 Penal of the Penal Law as "any play, motion picture, photograph, or dance" (emphasis supplied). Consequently the taking of the photographs with which defendant has been charged is a performance under the Penal Law and punishable thereunder.


Summaries of

People v. McIntyre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 1980
77 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. McIntyre

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ROY McINTYRE, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1980

Citations

77 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Capitello

The phrase is not unduly vague or unfamiliar in the criminal law, and was, in fact, given as an example of…

People v. Bulzing

Judgment affirmed. Contrary to defendant's assertion, his actions were sufficient to warrant conviction for…