From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McDonald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 2001
283 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted April 27, 2001

May 21, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered October 16, 1998, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal contempt in the second degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, criminal trespass in the second degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ethel P. Ross, Rye, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT and THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the jury charge with regard to the counts of assault in the second degree and resisting arrest was inadequate because certain terms in the charge were not defined. However, the charge on these two counts was proper, as the court employed the charge recommended in the pattern jury instructions (see, People v. Brown, 250 A.D.2d 774; People v. Dering, 140 A.D.2d 538). In addition, the defendant's contention that the court made misstatements of fact when it marshaled the evidence during the jury charge was not preserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Bowels, 220 A.D.2d 605).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McDonald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 2001
283 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES A. MCDONALD, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 21, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

State of N.Y. v. Pedro

The defendant contends that the jury charge with regard to the count of scheme to defraud in the first degree…

People v. Uribe

Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15(5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt…