Opinion
October 16, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court improperly marshaled the evidence in its charge to the jury. Since the defendant failed to object to the charge now claimed to have been improper, her claim is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see, CPL 470.05).
The defendant also asserts that the court erred in admitting her arrest photographs into evidence. As the appearance of the defendant at trial was dramatically different from that at the time of the crime and as the photographs corroborated trial testimony, the court properly admitted the photographs into evidence ( see, People v. Pobliner, 32 N.Y.2d 356, rearg denied 33 N.Y.2d 657, cert denied 416 U.S. 905; People v. Lakram, 207 A.D.2d 360, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1034, cert denied ___ US ___, 116 S Ct 235). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.