From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marte

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2013
103 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-14

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose MARTE, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Deborah L. Morse of counsel), for respondent.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Deborah L. Morse of counsel), for respondent.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, MANZANET–DANIELS, ROMÁN, CLARK, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J. at suppression motion; Analisa Torres, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered January 3, 2011, convicting defendant of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony, without granting a hearing pursuant to People v. Rodriguez, 79 N.Y.2d 445, 583 N.Y.S.2d 814, 593 N.E.2d 268 [1992]. Defendant did not dispute the People's contention that defendant was sufficiently known to the victim so as to render the photo identification merely confirmatory, and there was no factual issue requiring a hearing ( see e.g. People v. Rodriguez, 47 A.D.3d 417, 849 N.Y.S.2d 232 [2008],lv. denied10 N.Y.3d 816, 857 N.Y.S.2d 49, 886 N.E.2d 814 [2008];People v. Murray, 247 A.D.2d 292, 668 N.Y.S.2d 457 [1st Dept. 1998],lv. denied92 N.Y.2d 857, 677 N.Y.S.2d 88, 699 N.E.2d 448 [1998] ).

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence that the victim experienced difficulty sleeping following the incident, and that he began seeing a psychiatrist. This evidence was relevant to prove that the victim was brutally beaten during the robbery, especially where a defense witness described the incident as a brief fistfight not resulting in injuries.


Summaries of

People v. Marte

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2013
103 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Marte

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose MARTE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

103 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
103 A.D.3d 470
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 996

Citing Cases

People v. Washington

Defendant's motion sought such a hearing to test the People's assertion in their voluntary disclosure form…

People v. Thomas

Defendant did not set forth any facts to dispute the People's assertion that he and the identifying witness…