From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mangual

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 2009
59 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5296.

February 19, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene R. Silverman, J.), entered on or about January 9, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elizabeth B. Emmons of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Charlotte E. Fishman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.


Although the court did not use the expression "upward departure," it made clear that, in view of the extreme brutality of the underlying sex crime, it intended to depart upwardly to level three even if defendant's point score, standing alone, would support only a level two adjudication. This upward departure was based upon clear and convincing evidence of aggravating factors of a degree not taken into account by the risk assessment instrument and guidelines ( see e.g. People v Miller, 48 AD3d 774, lv denied 10 NY3d 711; People v Sanford, 47 AD3d 454, lv denied 10 NY3d 707).


Summaries of

People v. Mangual

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 2009
59 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Mangual

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. Luis MANGUAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 19, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1305
872 N.Y.S.2d 668