From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sanford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2008
47 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2530.

January 15, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), entered on or about March 18, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Nicole Beder of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


The hearing court properly determined that although defendant received points relating to the facts of the underlying sex crime, the risk assessment instrument failed to adequately take into account the extreme and unusual brutality of that crime, which warranted an upward departure ( see People v Ferrer, 35 AD3d 297, lv denied 8 NY3d 807 [2007]; People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033). The court considered defendant's behavior following his release from prison and properly concluded that factor was outweighed by the circumstances of the crime.


Summaries of

People v. Sanford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2008
47 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Sanford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL SANFORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 2008

Citations

47 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 184
848 N.Y.S.2d 875

Citing Cases

People v. Vaillancourt

Furthermore, defendant's contention that the court violated his due process rights by relying solely upon the…

People v. Ray

Regardless of whether defendant's correct point score would make him a presumptive risk level two or three…