From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maddox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 19, 1993

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant correctly contends that County Court erred in failing to charge the jury that his statement to the police would be involuntary if he had asserted his right to remain silent or had requested counsel during questioning (see, CPL 710.20; People v Griswold, 58 N.Y.2d 633, 635; People v Graham, 55 N.Y.2d 144). Because defendant failed to object to the court's instruction on voluntariness, however, that error has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Roth, 139 A.D.2d 605, 608, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 866; see also, People v Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467) and we decline to reach the issue as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15).


Summaries of

People v. Maddox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Maddox

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERMAINE L. MADDOX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 1014

Citing Cases

People v. Stroman

Thus, because the victim did not threaten suicide, we see no basis to disturb the court's finding that the…

People v. Scippio

Defendant also argues that County Court should have granted his request for a jury charge instructing that,…