From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lassic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 5, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly determined that the stop of his vehicle was based on reasonable suspicion ( see, People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234; People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210; People v. Ryan, 224 A.D.2d 644; People v. Bianchi, 208 A.D.2d 551, 552, affd 85 N.Y.2d 1022; People v. Mills, 198 A.D.2d 236; People v. Bedoya, 190 A.D.2d 812). Consequently, the evidence recovered as a result of the stop was admissible.

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lassic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Lassic

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDDIE LASSIC, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 281

Citing Cases

People v. Mondejar

During jury selection, the defendant raised an objection pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79),…

People v. Lassic

August 30, 2000 Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…