From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lane

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 7, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-7

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcus LANE, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered January 24, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Barbara J. Davies of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of Counsel), for Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered January 24, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree.
The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Barbara J. Davies of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of Counsel), for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15[4] ), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not valid, and he challenges the severity of the sentence. Although the record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145), we conclude that the valid waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of the sentence because Supreme Court failed to advise defendant of the potential maximum term of incarceration ( see People v. Newman, 21 A.D.3d 1343, 1343, 801 N.Y.S.2d 649;see generally People v. Lococo, 92 N.Y.2d 825, 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 57, 699 N.E.2d 416), and there was no specific sentence promise at the time of the waiver ( cf. People v. Semple, 23 A.D.3d 1058, 1059, 804 N.Y.S.2d 192,lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 852, 816 N.Y.S.2d 758, 849 N.E.2d 981). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lane

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 7, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcus LANE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 7, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4193
965 N.Y.S.2d 915