From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lococo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1998
92 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1998)

Opinion


92 N.Y.2d 825 699 N.E.2d 416, 677 N.Y.S.2d 57 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ellen M. LOCOCO and Michael J. Lococo, Appellants. The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey STANLEY, Appellant. 1998-05174 New York Court of Appeals June 4, 1998.

        Kevin J. Bauer, Buffalo, for Ellen Lococo appellant.

        Richard T. Farrell, Brooklyn, for Michael Lococo appellant.

        Kevin J. Bauer, Buffalo, and Browns&sMohun, Depew, for Jeffrey Stanley appellant.

        Frank J. Clark, District Attorney of Erie County, Buffalo (Raymond C. Herman and J. Michael Marion, of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

        MEMORANDUM.

        The order of the Erie County Court should be affirmed in each case.

        Defendants contend that they did not waive their right to appeal the severity of the court's sentence. We disagree.

        Each defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived the right to appeal from any and all aspects of their case, including the severity of the sentence (see, People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46[decided today]; People v. Allen, 82 N.Y.2d 761, 603 N.Y.S.2d 820, 623 N.E.2d 1170; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022). While defendants did not know the specific sentence at the time of the waiver, they did know the maximum sentence the trial court could impose in its discretion. Since defendants knew the maximum exposure they could face upon pleading guilty, the waiver of their right to challenge the sentence in each case was knowing and intelligent (see, People v. Hidalgo, supra; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108).

        KAYE, C.J., and TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY, JJ., concur.

        In each case: Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Lococo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1998
92 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Lococo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELLEN M. LOCOCO and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1998

Citations

92 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 57
699 N.E.2d 416

Citing Cases

People v. Stevenson

During the plea colloquy, Supreme Court provided defendant with "an extensive and detailed description of the…

People v. Stevenson

We reject defendant's contention in his main and pro se supplemental briefs that his waiver of the right to…