From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Koreen Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 1997
236 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

February 27, 1997.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered August 7, 1995, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Before: Cardona, P.J., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ.


Defendant was arrested after selling cocaine to an undercover police officer. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, defendant subsequently pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to a prison term of 2 to 6 years. Defendant contends that her sentence is harsh and excessive and constitutes an abuse of discretion on the part of County Court. We disagree. The sentence was within the statutory guidelines and was the agreed-upon result of a plea bargain. While this is defendant's first criminal conviction, she has nonetheless been found guilty of a serious crime. Hence, the sentence imposed by County Court cannot be characterized as an abuse of discretion and we decline to disturb it ( see, People v Sullivan, 223 AD2d 893, 894; People v Willis, 200 AD2d 903, 904).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Koreen Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 1997
236 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Koreen Hayes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KOREEN HAYES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1997

Citations

236 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
653 N.Y.S.2d 738

Citing Cases

People v. James

15[5]; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we nevertheless accord great…

People v. James

15[5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to…