From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kirker

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Jun 24, 2013
2d Crim. No. B246928 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 24, 2013)

Opinion

2d Crim. No. B246928

06-24-2013

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THOMAS ALLEN KIRKER, Defendant and Appellant.

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard R. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Appellant./ No appearance for Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Super. Ct. No. F479307

(San Luis Obispo County)

Thomas Allen Kirker appeals from the judgment entered after he pled no contest to assault (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4)) and admitted a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (d)-(e); 1170.12, subds. (b)-(c)). Five weeks after the plea, appellant indicated that he wanted to withdraw his plea, but after new counsel was appointed, withdrew the plea withdrawal motion. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted probation with 90 days jail. Appellant was ordered to pay a $240 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b); a $240 probation revocation fine (§ 1202.44), and a $1,000 fine.

All statutory references are to the Penal Code.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal and a request for certificate of probable cause (§ 1237.5, subd. (a)) alleging that he did not commit the assault.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues. On May 9, 2013, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. No response has been received.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 125-126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J. We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J.

Michael Duffy, Judge


Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard R. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Appellant./

No appearance for Respondent.


Summaries of

People v. Kirker

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Jun 24, 2013
2d Crim. No. B246928 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 24, 2013)
Case details for

People v. Kirker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THOMAS ALLEN KIRKER, Defendant…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: Jun 24, 2013

Citations

2d Crim. No. B246928 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 24, 2013)