From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Keeton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 15, 1994

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Connell, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's absence from the side-bar questioning of one prospective juror does not require reversal because, immediately after the side-bar conference, the prospective juror was excused by consent of both parties (see, People v Castro-Garcia, 203 A.D.2d 899 [decided herewith]; People v Arnold, 201 A.D.2d 965; People v Johnson, 201 A.D.2d 965).


Summaries of

People v. Keeton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Keeton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEITH KEETON, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 997

Citing Cases

People v. Castro-Garcia

Although a side-bar conference with a prospective juror was conducted in defendant's absence, that…