From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Castro-Garcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 15, 1994

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Auser, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant's request for a missing witness charge. Although it was evident from the prosecutor's voir dire and opening statement that the victim would not testify, defendant did not request a missing witness charge until both sides had rested. Defendant's request was, therefore, untimely (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 427-428; People v Peterson, 188 A.D.2d 1002, 1003, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 891).

We reject the contention that defendant was deprived of his right of confrontation when a police officer was permitted to testify to the victim's out-of-court identification of defendant as the victim's assailant. That testimony was properly admitted under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Brown, 70 N.Y.2d 513; People v Jones, 175 A.D.2d 662, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 828).

Although a side-bar conference with a prospective juror was conducted in defendant's absence, that prospective juror was excused. Thus, reversal on that ground is not required (see, People v Keeton, 203 A.D.2d 899 [decided herewith]; People v Arnold, 201 A.D.2d 965; People v Johnson, 201 A.D.2d 965).

Defendant was not deprived of the right to be present at the Sandoval hearing. The record reveals that the Sandoval hearing, as well as the Wade and Huntley hearings, was conducted in the courtroom and that defendant was present "throughout the uninterrupted proceedings" (People v Sanders, 199 A.D.2d 1011, 1012).

Finally, we conclude that the court's charge on reasonable doubt, viewed in its entirety, conveyed the proper standard to the jury (see, People v Stokes, 198 A.D.2d 847).


Summaries of

People v. Castro-Garcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Castro-Garcia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUIS CASTRO-GARCIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 711

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

We disagree. Immediately after the side-bar discussion, the prosecutor exercised a peremptory challenge and…

People v. Santiago

Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant's request for a missing witness charge. The request, made…