Opinion
October 5, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fisher, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to properly preserve many of his present objections regarding the allegedly prejudicial effect of certain testimony and statements made during the prosecutor's summation (see, CPL 470.05; People v. George, 108 A.D.2d 870). In any event, the defendant's claims are without merit (see, People v Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837; People v McKutchen, 76 A.D.2d 934). Finally, we do not find the sentence to be excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.