From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. George

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1985
108 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 19, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.).


Judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The testimony of the People's witnesses portrayed the defendant as having inflicted severe and multiple wounds on the complainant's back, buttocks and legs, by stabbing her repeatedly with a butcher knife as the complainant was lying face down on the floor. Defendant's testimony was that there was a struggle over the knife, during which the complainant was cut on her arm and leg.

The nature of the wounds and the manner of their infliction were factual questions to be resolved by the jury. The prosecutor's description of the wounds in his opening statement was an accurate account of what the People intended to prove, and we find no merit to defendant's claim he was deprived of a fair trial because the description was inflammatory. No objection was made to the prosecutor's summation. Thus, defendant's claim that he was prejudiced by the vivid description of the attack is not preserved for review (CPL 470.05) and, in any event, the summation was a fair comment on the evidence. There is no merit to defendant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence the ripped, bloodstained nightgown worn by the complainant during the attack. The fact that the location of the rips in the nightgown corresponded to the complainant's account of where she was injured was probative on the issue of the location of the wounds and the manner in which the complainant was injured ( People v Pobliner, 32 N.Y.2d 356, 369, cert denied 416 U.S. 905).

We have considered defendant's other contention and find it to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. George

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1985
108 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. George

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT GEORGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Young

However, no objection was made to these remarks at trial. Thus, the defendant's argument is unpreserved for…

People v. Valentin

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. While the trial court erred in excluding, as hearsay, certain…