From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2020
8 Cal.5th 1037 (Cal. 2020)

Opinion

No. S029551.

02-11-2020

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOE EDWARD JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant.


[Modification of opinion (8 Cal.5th 475; 255 Cal.Rptr.3d 393, 453 P.3d 38), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT.—The majority opinion in this case, filed on November 25, 2019, and appearing at 8 Cal.5th 475 [255 Cal.Rptr.3d 393, 453 P.3d 38], is modified as follows:

1. The first sentence of the third full paragraph on page 494 [8 Cal.5th 494, advance report, 3d full par., lines 1-2] presently reads: "At a pretrial hearing on June 12, trial counsel indicated that they were ready to proceed with trial as scheduled." This sentence is modified to read as follows:

At a discovery sanctions hearing on June 12, the court confirmed the scheduled June 22 trial date, and counsel for both parties indicated that they anticipated proceeding with pretrial motions on that date.

2. The last sentence of the second full paragraph on page 501 [8 Cal.5th 501, advance report, 2d full par., lines 10-11] presently reads: "Meanwhile, trial counsel advised the court on June 12 that they were ready to proceed with trial as scheduled." This sentence is modified to read as follows:

Meanwhile, trial counsel advised the court on June 12 that they intended to adhere to the existing trial schedule.

This modification does not affect the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2020
8 Cal.5th 1037 (Cal. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOE EDWARD JOHNSON, Defendant and…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2020

Citations

8 Cal.5th 1037 (Cal. 2020)