From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jaworowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 1994
201 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 7, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After entering a plea of guilty, the defendant made a written pro se motion to withdraw his plea. The court denied his motion without a hearing. Since the defendant was afforded a "reasonable opportunity to present his contentions", and the court was able "to make an informed determination in accordance with the principles laid down in People v. Nixon ( 21 N.Y.2d 338)", the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to conduct a hearing (People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927; People v. Black, 170 A.D.2d 383). Moreover, the defendant's motion was without merit (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v Black, supra).

The defendant also failed to make the necessary showing of good cause to warrant substitution of assigned counsel (see, People v Sawyer, 57 N.Y.2d 12; People v. Medina, 44 N.Y.2d 199; People v Stubbs, 175 A.D.2d 187). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jaworowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 1994
201 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Jaworowski

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN J. JAWOROWSKI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 792

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The record demonstrates that the defendant voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal as part…

People v. Gomez

, People v Rodriguez, 189 A.D.2d 684; see also, People v. Pernell, 189 A.D.2d 833, 834). Moreover, the court…