From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1994
205 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 27, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.).


Ordered that the notice of appeal, dated May 7, 1993, from the judgments rendered under indictments No. 1286/92, 2679/92, and 2881/92 is deemed amended to include the judgment rendered under indictment No. 336/93 (see, CPL 460.10), and the decision and order of this Court, dated January 11, 1994, assigning counsel is amended accordingly; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel in connection with his application to withdraw his pleas of guilty (cf., People v Rodriguez, 189 A.D.2d 684; see also, People v. Pernell, 189 A.D.2d 833, 834). Moreover, the court permissibly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's application (see, e.g., People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927; People v. Jaworowski, 201 A.D.2d 504; People v. Alicea, 191 A.D.2d 702). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1994
205 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD GOMEZ, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 925

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The record demonstrates that the defendant voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal as part…

People v. McNeil

Defendant appeals. Although defendant neglected to include the indictment numbers from both sentences in the…