From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jacques

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division
Feb 14, 2011
No. E047717 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 14, 2011)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANDRE JERIEL JACQUES et al., Defendants and Appellants. E047717 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Second Division February 14, 2011

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super.Ct.No. SWF016690

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

RAMIREZ P.J.

The petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion filed in this matter on January 18, 2011, is hereby modified, as follows:

1. On page 37, in the first full paragraph the number 10 is changed to the number 5.

2. On page 37, in the first full paragraph, the following footnote number 32 is added as follows:

“The parties agree that since there was no allegation that the robbery was in concert and no such finding was made by the jury, the term should be three, four or six years, plus the 5 year gang enhancement.”

We note that in his reply brief, and in agreement with the People, Jacques stated that this term should be 10 years, a position he claims is erroneous in his petition for rehearing.

3. In the first full paragraph on page 38, the word ten is changed to five.

Except for this modification, the opinion remains unchanged. This modification does not change the judgment.

We concur: HOLLENHORST J., McKINSTER J.


Summaries of

People v. Jacques

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division
Feb 14, 2011
No. E047717 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 14, 2011)
Case details for

People v. Jacques

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANDRE JERIEL JACQUES et al.…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division

Date published: Feb 14, 2011

Citations

No. E047717 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 14, 2011)