Opinion
August 1, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.).
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that in the event his conviction of rape in the first degree, rape in the second degree, sodomy in the first degree, and sodomy in the second degree, under Kings County Indictment No. 2290/91 is reversed on direct appeal, then his admission to the instant violation of probation should be vacated and the amended judgment reversed. However, the Kings County judgment of conviction has been affirmed by this Court on appeal (see, People v. Hodges, 204 A.D.2d 739). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.