From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Heyward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 28, 1993

Appeal from the Ontario County Court, Harvey, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Pine, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that the information supporting the search warrant was stale merely because it was acquired 12 and 13 days before the issuance of the warrant (see, People v Bryan, 191 A.D.2d 1029; People v Clarke, 173 A.D.2d 550). The search warrant application provided the issuing Magistrate with information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence of illegal drug activity would be present at the time and place of the search (see, People v Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417; 423; People v Bryan, supra; People v St. Louis, 177 A.D.2d 882, 885, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 953).

Defendant's sentence is neither harsh nor excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Heyward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Heyward

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAROLD HEYWARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 28, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 661

Citing Cases

Town of East Hampton v. Omabuild USA No. 1, Inc.

Hence, "probable cause is not to be determined by counting the number of days between the occurrence of the…