From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hamill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1991
175 A.D.2d 265 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 22, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant in this case made a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment on both statutory and constitutional speedy trial grounds (see, CPL 30.20, 30.30 Crim. Proc.; People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 444-445). However, the defendant's speedy trial argument, to the extent that it is based on statutory rather than constitutional provisions, is beyond the scope of appellate review by virtue of his plea of guilty (see, People v Gooden, 151 A.D.2d 773; see also, People v Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686, 688; People v Prescott, 66 N.Y.2d 216, 220, cert denied 475 U.S. 1150). Moreover, based upon our review of the record on appeal, we find no proof that the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated (see, People v Sledge, 122 A.D.2d 293).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hamill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1991
175 A.D.2d 265 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Hamill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD P. HAMILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 265 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 914