From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Grinstead

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 8, 2016
499 Mich. 866 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 152280. COA No. 327917.

03-08-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jayson Michael GRINSTEAD, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. The defendant is entitled to jail credit for the period of time he was incarcerated and unable to post bond. MCL 769.11b. Irrespective of whether the trial court resentences the defendant, the court shall amend the judgment of sentence to award appropriate jail credit. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Grinstead

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 8, 2016
499 Mich. 866 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Grinstead

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jayson Michael…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 866 (Mich. 2016)
875 N.W.2d 225