Opinion
October 1, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.).
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence disproving defendant's agency defense, including proof that defendant, a complete stranger to the undercover officer, responded to the officer's request for a "twenty piece" by telling him to follow, escorted him to a drug location, took his money, obtained drugs for the officer from inside the location, and was arrested in possession of prerecorded buy money ( see, People v. Herring, 83 N.Y.2d 780). Defendant's acquittal of another count does not affect the weight and sufficiency of the evidence supporting the count on which he was convicted ( People v. Rivera, 201 A.D.2d 377, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 875).
We find no error in the court's charge on the defense of agency. There was no confusion with respect to. the relationship between defendant and the buyer or defendant and the seller ( see, People v. Job, 87 N.Y.2d 956).
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.