From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gregory

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 12, 2016
143 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

10-12-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Laurence GREGORY, appellant.

Leon H. Tracy, Jericho, NY, for appellant. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Andrea M. DiGregorio and Pamela Kelly–Pincus of counsel), for respondent.


Leon H. Tracy, Jericho, NY, for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Andrea M. DiGregorio and Pamela Kelly–Pincus of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Corrigan, J.), entered May 8, 2015, as denied, without a hearing, that branch of his motion which was to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed on November 2, 2001.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a new determination of that branch of the defendant's motion which was to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46.

On a motion by a defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, “[t]he court shall offer an opportunity for a hearing and bring the applicant before it” (L. 2004, ch. 738 § 23; see CPL 440.46[3] ; People v. Golo, 26 N.Y.3d 358, 362, 23 N.Y.S.3d 110, 44 N.E.3d 185 ; People v. Davis, 136 A.D.3d 1106, 1107, 24 N.Y.S.3d 536 ; People v. Bens, 109 A.D.3d 664, 972 N.Y.S.2d 576 ). Inasmuch as this procedure was not followed in the instant case, the order appealed from must be reversed insofar as appealed from, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a new determination of that branch of the defendant's motion which was to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46, to be made after affording the defendant an opportunity to appear before the court, and, if necessary, for the court to conduct a hearing (see People v. Golo, 26 N.Y.3d at 363, 23 N.Y.S.3d 110, 44 N.E.3d 185 ; People v. Davis, 136 A.D.3d at 1107, 24 N.Y.S.3d 536; People v. Cain, 117 A.D.3d 1282, 1283, 986 N.Y.S.2d 275 ; People v. Duke, 111 A.D.3d 955, 956, 975 N.Y.S.2d 466 ; People v. Allen, 105 A.D.3d 969, 963 N.Y.S.2d 335 ).

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gregory

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 12, 2016
143 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Gregory

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Laurence GREGORY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 12, 2016

Citations

143 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6724
38 N.Y.S.3d 814

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens…

People v. Wilson

On a motion by a defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, "[t]he court shall offer…