From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Geddert

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 21, 2016
884 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151280. COA No. 325412.

09-21-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Raymond Clarence GEDDERT, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

By order of July 28, 2015, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Alpena Circuit Court and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. The trial court assigned no points to any Offense Variables (OVs), but departed from the sentencing guidelines range in part because of the defendant's pattern of prior narcotics offenses. In light of this, based on facts reported in the presentence information report, the trial court was required to assign 10 points to OV 13 for a pattern of three or more controlled-substance felonies. MCL 777.43(1)(e). Even though the guidelines ranges are now advisory, the scoring of the guidelines themselves is mandatory, and the OVs must be assigned the highest number of points applicable. MCL 777.43(1) ; People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 392 n. 28, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). Because correcting the OV score would change the applicable guidelines range, resentencing is required. People v. Francisco, 474 Mich. 82, 711 N.W.2d 44 (2006).

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Geddert

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 21, 2016
884 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Geddert

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Raymond Clarence…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 21, 2016

Citations

884 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. 2016)